Friday 21 February 2020

Can’t See the Wood for the Trees

Wargames trees have always posed three problems for me. 

First is that to represent established woods or forests I like tall trees, which means for my preferred 28mm figures they need to be somewhere between 100mm (4”) and 150mm (6”) tall. For fruit trees and smaller less establish plantations trees can be as low as 50mm, which will also suit some of our 15mm games. Some 30 years ago we were fortunate as group to secure a significant stock of the Heki (a German model railway scenery manufacturer) trees when a local distributor quit the market. These met the height criteria, but after all that time were in need of upgrading The problem here is that much of what is around today does not match the quality of the models we bought all those years ago and where quality is available the price is prohibitive.

The second problem is the robustness. Wargames trees get pretty roughly handled. The Heki trees have done us well over the years because they were very well made, but they are definitely showing their age: the plastic trunks are becoming brittle so that some have snapped off the base and branches have broken off or the foam chip used as foliage has either fallen off or has faded. The question is how to create that robustness?

The third problem is their use. I am a visual sort of person and I like my trees and woods to be on bases. The issue this causes is that it can become difficult to move stands of figures within the woods.

Way back in 2014 I posted another (link) article on woods that solved the third problem so problems one and two need a solution.

A couple of weeks ago I saw a model railroad tutorial on YouTube (link) on making trees that gave me an idea. However, this method of construction would not be robust enough for gaming and the weak point I saw in this method was in the trunk, so I thought of an alternative - the old twisted wire trunk. I decided to give it a go.

Taking four lengths of 16 gauge wire, each about 200 mm in length, I folded each in half then roughly twisted them together, making sure that the looped end was untwisted. 

Then the four twisted strands were twisted around each other to form the trunk and lower branches.


In the past when I have used this technique I have covered the wire with toilet paper coated with PVA to get that wrinkled bark look, but in keeping with the desire for robustness this time I chose to apply Sculpey polymer clay. This was quite a quick task and when all the wire was covered I scribed a bark texture into the surface, sculpted a base, fixed part of a bamboo skewer in the top to support the canopy and then baked it in the oven.


Once set and cooled I painted the trunk using Games Workshop Contrast Snakebite Leather thinned 50:50 with medium. Then to give tone I lightly drybrushed it with a grey/brown.


The next step was to create the foliage. This was done by cutting a strip of coconut matting, as shown in the YouTube video, from a hanging basket liner that was about 70 mm at the base and 25mm at the top. This was then cut into squares and then trimmed into irregular round shapes of ever decreasing diameter, divided in half (by thickness) and pushed onto the skewer and fixed with a drop of PVA glue at each level. A bit of trimming with some scissors got rid of the odd unwanted loose fibre.


Before I added the foliage I sprayed the coconut matting black, to give depth.


I then sprayed the foliage area with a spray adhesive and rolled it in some Woodlands Scenics clump foliage I had on hand and left it to dry in the sun outside...to avoid complaints about “that smelly stuff”. And here is the result.


The completion of the first tree got me thinking about how I could do it better. The first thought was why do I need the wire form? All I really need is the base, the trunk and the skewer and I can make the base and trunk out of Sculpey, with the trunk wrapped around the skewer. I think the layers if coconut matting can also be spread out a bit too, to create space a more irregular shape. But all that is a subject for another post.



20 comments:

  1. I still use Heki trees and mine have held up well. Mine are evergreens. Perhaps evergreens hold up better than deciduous? I have one large unopened box remaining.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Our have moved premises many times and hauled up and down the country. I suspect that this is the root cause of the damage.

      Delete
  2. Very nice work here Mark ....don't you think creating thirty or forty trees this way might be a bit time consuming/daunting..knowing you, probably not! The prototype looks very nice anyway.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Once I get the process right ten a week will be a comfortable pace.

      Delete
  3. Thats a beautiful tree and you should be very impressed. A good tree adds to the spectacle of a wargame, so well done.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Robbie. I have started on the next version that will be taller and more open. It is fun stuff.

      Delete
  4. Nice work on the tree. I see you are already fiddling to make improvements!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks. There a couple of variants already under way

      Delete
  5. Looks good Mark. I'll be interested to see how the non-wire trees go. Will they be as robust? At some point I need to make some trees that will work in with my 54mm figures, and I like the idea of using the coconut matting. Nice post.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Nathan. The coconut matting works well and was cheap - I think it cost me $5 at the Warehouse. I am actually down your way today for a family function, heading back tomorrow.

      Delete
  6. Very good looking tree. Regarding the wire, I baked some sculpty back in college, and since then I have found that the wire framed pieces have held up, but the unsupported pieces did not. So if you want more than a few years out of the trees, I would consider the wire (you could use a single strand of heavier gauge wire if that speeds things along)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I am going to try a number of options, one of which is a nail - the four inch variety should work well and I have lots in the shed.

      Delete
  7. That looks great Mark. I purchased all of my trees and I think those made of wire look the best as they have a gnarled look to them. It will be interesting to see how your second version works out.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I like the way that they all coming together. The gnarled ones will make excellent olive trees if I use a different coloured foliage...lots of room for experimentation.

      Delete
  8. That works really well Mark...

    I am afraid I am really lazy with trees ... I use K&M... when they get a bit worn I spray them with watered down PVA... using a plant spray... and dip them in the appropriate K&M flock

    I works for me...;-)

    All the best. Aly

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What I really wanted to do was create something that could be 3D printed. Remember the old Britain’s trees? They had a plastic trunk, plug in boughs and a soft plastic plug on foliage. This should be possible with 3D printing, with the ability to create foliage with individual leaves. They could look good, be relatively cheap and would be robust for wargames use. But I can’t summon the enthusiasm to learn the 3D drawing software.

      Delete
  9. Looks great, though also a lot of work!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. They are a bit of work, but I figure that once I get the process sorted I can make a good number in a batch.

      Delete
  10. I quite like making trees, although I made a batch out of pipe cleaners and they rusted away as pipe cleaners are very thin wire, I'd have thought you would need some armature, 4" wire nail certainly sounds enough, I do like the clump finish!
    Best

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The bamboo skewer holds up well as an armature, but I am trying all kinds of options.

      Delete