Monday, 27 April 2026

The McPherson Farm Part 1: The Farmhouse

Completing the Trostle farm recently got me interested in making another farm set of an equally (possibly more) famous Gettysburg farm - the McPherson farm from the first day's battle. Arguably one building on this farm, the bank barn, is one of the most recognised structures on the battlefield.

The McPherson farm stood just short of a mile northeast of the Gettysburg town limits on a ridge (that didn't earn the name McPherson's Ridge until after the battle) and is famous because it was the first point of serious Union resistance in the battle, where Buford's cavalry was relieved by the infantry of Reynolds' First Corps. The Chambersburg Turnpike bisected the farm on its long axis and the unfinished railroad cut through the property a hundred yards or more north of the Pike.


In 1863 the farm was owned by Edward McPherson, but he was an absentee landlord, having been elected to Congress in 1858. At the time of the battle the farm was occupied by a tenant farmer John Slentz with his wife Eliza and their three children. With a total area of 95 acres most of the farm was planted in crops - wheat, corn, oats, and grass - while the remainder, about thirty acres, was in woodland, a young orchard for home use and pasture for the animals (Slentz maintained a small stock of dairy cows, pigs, chickens and four farm horses).


Finding sufficient information to be able to make a model that represented the farm as it was in 1863 presented an interesting exercise in research. What makes it difficult to form a picture of how the farm looked in 1863 is that the farmhouse and the wagon house/corn crib burned down in 1895 and there is only one contemporary photograph (below), taken by Matthew Brady within days of the battle. All that remains of the farm today is the barn. 



The photograph presents a view that the Confederates of Archer's Brigade would have had of the farm as they crossed Willoughby Run on the farm's southwestern border
. The  barn and wagon house/corn crib are clearly seen on the left and centre (and there are several other later images to give an even clearer view of those buildings), but this is the only contemporary shot of the farm house and details are indistinct and shielded from view by trees. Other views of the farmhouse were taken 20-30 years after the battle when the building had been significantly altered.

Thankfully there is a fabulous study of the farm; "Edward McPherson Farm: Historical Study" by Kathleen H. George, a research historian at the Gettysburg National Military Park, published in 1977. This  rather dry 207 page typed manuscript digs deep into a wealth of obscure information and paints a word picture of the place that is good enough for me to make this model with confidence.


The original farm was established by William Breadon in 1797-98 who built a log barn 50 feet by 17 feet and a log house measuring 20 feet x 17 feet on the site - apparently 17 feet is the maximum width for a single-span log structure before complex internal framing or central supports are required. Breadon couldn't make a go of it and sold up in the early 1800s. Under the new owner the barn was rebuilt as a stone structure that can be seen as the centre of the structure today, to which several wooden lean-tos were added over the years. Around the same time the log house was reconfigured to a kitchen and dining room downstairs, and two bedrooms upstairs while a fieldstone extension measuring  24 feet by 16 feet and "two steps higher" than the log structure, that featured  a living room and three more bedrooms, was added to the northern end aof the house. A large exterior fireplace and chimney was at the rear of the log section and a smaller internal one in the stone section. The county records describe the stone section as having "three windows, five lights",  that typically meant it had three windows across upper floor, with two more and a door below, aligned vertically to the upper windows. Because property taxes were based on the  number of windows, other than the 'five lights' there was unlikely to be more and allows me to conclude that all the windows of the stone section would have been on the one face although I have assumed that there was a door on the opposite side because it created the shortest distance to the privy. 


My sketch of the western face of the farmhouse from Kathleen George's description 


The whole structure, log and stone, was whitewashed. This made it a very difficult model to paint and make it look interesting. 


 
Above and below the bland basic build...


...and below interest is provided by the inclusion of the garden, a couple of small trees and privy.







 

The research for this model turned up two interesting points about the terrain near the farm, both of which I remember had been mentioned in a YouTube video that I watched a year or so ago by one of the Gettysburg Military Park guides. The first was about the woods, specifically the Herbst's Wood (often erroneously called McPherson's Wood and now commonly called Reynolds' Wood), and the McPherson woodlot - a narrow strip that stood north of the railroad cut. Both these woods were purposefully maintained as a wood supply for the respective farms - for firewood and for fencing. The lower branches were trimmed for firewood and any trees that fell naturally were used for fencing. In addition, it was a common farming practice that the farm animals would be grazed in the woods, stripping out the undergrowth. As such these woods, and likely a number of other small farm woods nearby, were not like they are today, with heavy undergrowth, but were more open and grove-like, able to be seen right through. 


A view through the Herbst's Wood from where General Reynolds was killed to the McPherson barn. The worm fence that was the boundary between the Herbst's and McPherson's farms can also be seen.

An almost opposite view to above, looking across the McPherson cornfield, with the Herbst's Wood running left to centre on its boundary. This Matthew Brady image was taken twelve days after the battle.


This 1896 image shows how open the woods were around the time that the land was
acquired by the National Military Park


The second point is that a county ordinance required farmers to fence their boundaries, so fences are important at Gettysburg. I imagine that this was common in many other counties and states. On the McPherson farm there were four types of fence used: post and 5-rail fences ran along the southern edge of the Chambersburg Pike and around the cornfield; Virginia Worm (zigzag) fences ran along the northern side of the Pike, around the fields north of the Pike and on the southern border along Herbst's Wood; post and board fences (5, 6-inch horizontal planks) lined the farm lane, the barn yard and the lane to the quarry; lastly a picket fence surrounded the farm garden.



Work has commenced on the barn and wagon shed/corn crib (with its attached pig pen), but progress will be slow while I work on some more figures. 





Friday, 24 April 2026

Admitting to an Addiction...Again...

In January 2018 I declared an addiction - to hussars - when I completed my 22nd hussar unit...I am a hussar-aholic. I now need to declare another addiction...cuirassiers - since this is the first of four French cuirassier regiments for the Franco-Prussian War and the 22nd cuirassier unit across all my collections. Soon that total will rise to 25. Mind you, I should probably declare that I have even more dragoons...almost as many as the other two types combined...but I have broken that addiction (I think)...actually that is probably not true because I will be buying two regiments of French FPW dragoons if the Perrys ever release them.

La Charge des Cuirassiers à Reichshoffen, by Aimé Morot, 1887


French cuirassiers have a special place in the history of the Franco-Prussian War (and my heart) because of the way they were callously sacrificed at Froeschwiller on 6 August 1870. I have written at length on this subject before (here).  This (and my fascination with cavalry) is why I just had to add these cuirassiers to my collection. 





There were eleven regiments of cuirassiers in French service in 1870; ten line regiments and the Guard Cuirassiers - actually it would be quite reasonable to add the Guard Carabiniers to the list and make it twelve regiments. The line regiments were spread between the line and reserve divisions, with four regiments forming Bonnemains' Division from the cavalry reserve, two in Forton's Division of the Reserve and two regiments included in each of the cavalry divisions of the 1st and 6th Corps. 



Their relatively simple uniform makes them rather striking.




Tuesday, 21 April 2026

Back to the Franco-Prussians

With the arrival of parcel from the UK and the restoration of the lead pile a couple of Fridays ago my five month hiatus from figure painting is ended and I am back to working on the Franco-Prussians.

This time it is the French generals and a small unit of French lancers that were released earlier this year...actually it was July last year...My God the months have drifted by so quickly!

These are the first three brigadiers. 


Eventually there will be six infantry brigadiers, two cavalry brigadiers, a cavalry divisional command and three officers for the corps command. Since there are only three variants on this generals set, I will make a few head and arm conversions using spare parts from the plastic sets for the next batch.

Also riding off the painting desk are six figures representing two squadrons of the 6th Lancer Regiment, that rode disastrously in the charge of Michel's brigade at Morsbronn on 6 August 1870. Now most reference show the French lancers either wearing czapska or the kepi, but these are modelled wearing the bonnet de police. Apparently all options are relevant. The painting News from the Front by Georges Louis Hyon of the 2nd Lancers on the heights above Morsbronn just prior to their charge clearly shows them in the bonnet de police.





I have to say that when I last posted about the cavalry of this range (wayback in 2023) I was disappointed by the quality of the design. These figures show a significant improvement, particularly with the robustness of the swords.




Next to come will be more generals and the first of four regiments of cuirassiers.

Sunday, 19 April 2026

War of Spanish Succession Game

Today we played the War of Spanish Succession game that we had to postpone from last week.

Eight players were involved. On each side there were two cavalry commands and two infantry. It was a simply "beat the crap out of 'em" game.

The Allied deployment

The French deployment

The full table

The recently built church stood in the centre of the table

I commanded a body of French cavalry, five regiments strong. Opposite me was an equivalent force of English horse. My object was to draw them into a fight where I could get the better if them. But they moved first

Here they come...

And more of them...


Things got off to a roaring start for me with my cuirassiers smashing two English battalions (the furst by the skin of their teeth, I might add).

Then the fight with the English horse began. I did well, destroying two regiments and forcing the other three back.

In the thick of the fray

"En Avant.."


The Garde du Corps go in

Oops...things aren't looking so good here...

...and even worse here...with just one if my five regiments left...and that didn't last long.

With the French cavalry collapsing on both flanks, the allies could sweep forward and drive the French from the field...it was a bad day for Marshal Vendome.

An now for a bunch if photos of the rest if the battle, that I struggle to put into sequence because I was focused on my own defeat! However, if does celebrate this fabulous army collected over 47 years from Citadel, Dixon, Minifigs, Foundry, Ebor and probably some other manufacturers.

Venfome rode in comfort...