Saturday 30 September 2023

Nizam-i-cedid infantry

In October 2018 I completed the last of five infantry and five cavalry units of an Ottoman contingent to support the British in Egypt (was it really that long ago). While it had been my intent to develop a full Ottoman Army that could stand alone against the French, the only manufacturer of Napoleonic Ottoman figures that I like were by a Brigade Games and as lovely as those figures are I was put off by their higher base cost, the weakness of the $NZ against the $US and the high postage rates from the US which makes these figures some of the most expensive to buy from this part of the world.

So when Alan Perry released the first packs of Ottoman infantry, I got excited because Perry figures are a much better economic equation for me. I even bought the Ottoman book from Caliver Books to get started, but my first figure purchase had to wait until the initial mass of red trousers Frenchmen was completed. So late August, with the last pair of the red trousers under the brush, I included two units of Nizam-i-cedid infantry and one of Malmuk cavalry in my order for the FPW artillery and cavalry that have been passing though these pages of late.

Here is the the first unit of Nizam-i-cedid infantry in the Boustanges hat.




The plan - be it a very fluid plan that will depend on forthcoming releases from the Perrys - is to add another five or six units each of foot and mounted, plus some artillery, which is enough to outnumber the French. If the range expands and covers the Ottoman army that fought the Russians then a slight expansion in that direction is possible too.

20 comments:

  1. These fellas are superb! I did not know Perry made Ottomans.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Jonathan. This is one of their new ranges and it is expanding at a good rate!

      Delete
  2. I thought you had started up a fantasy army there for a minute Mark - LOL! These Turkish/Ottomon infantry look very impressive - red and blue is always a good mix for pre 20th century uniforms!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes they have that fantasy look with that hat. There is quite a mix of colours to work with on these guys...the red is actually more dominant than I expected.

      Delete
  3. Very nice Mark, great looking figures from a very useful range.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Stuart...I can see a battle of the Pyramids coming on...

      Delete
  4. These look very striking. A lovely job on them Mark. An Ottoman army to fight the Russians would be very tempting. I haven't seem many rulesets that treat them kindly though.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Lawrence. The Ottomans came off pretty badly against the Russians in most of the actions so the rules are probably pretty accurate. I am two-thirds of the way through the first Mamaluke unit...they are fabulous figures!

      Delete
  5. Very striking and then something as simple as the waistband sash, elevates it even more.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Norm. I will try some different colour combinations with the next foot unit.

      Delete
  6. A lovely unit Mark…
    You certainly have a choice of some very colourful troops with the Ottomans.
    The blue trouser will certainly make a pleasant change from red… 🤔hmmm 😁

    All the best. Aly

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes I seem to have attraction to red, don't I? And there is another big batch of the red trousered chaps coming.

      Delete
  7. Yes, the Pyramids! Wonderfully painted, colorful units.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. As intriguing as making the Giza Pyramids is, the battle was actually fought some 15 miles north of Giza. But there is still an idea there...

      Delete
  8. Oh wow! Love those figures- great brushwork too!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks John. I have a unit of cavalry to post today that are just fabulous.

      Delete
  9. Something different on show there Mark and wonderful to behold. Those hats are rather striking and not something that I've seen before.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Steve. Apparently that hat had a cardboard former that misformed very easily with wear, but it certainly unique!

      Delete